Swiss vote on banning tobacco promoting, animal testing


Issued on:

Geneva (AFP) – The Swiss head to the polls Sunday to determine whether or not to ban virtually all promoting of tobacco merchandise and individually on a blanket ban on all animal testing.

In-person voting on these and different matters will start at 10:00 am (0900 GMT) as a part of Switzerland’s direct democracy system, though most individuals vote prematurely by publish.

Latest polls point out that the initiative to tighten Switzerland’s notoriously lax tobacco legal guidelines by banning all promoting of the health-hazardous merchandise wherever minors would possibly see it — successfully all settings — is the most probably to cross.

Switzerland lags far behind most rich nations in proscribing tobacco promoting — a scenario broadly blamed on hefty lobbying by a number of the world’s largest tobacco firms headquartered within the nation.

At present, most tobacco promoting stays authorized at a nationwide degree, besides on tv and radio, or advertisements that particularly goal minors.

Some Swiss cantons have launched stricter regional laws and a brand new nationwide legislation is pending, however campaigners gathered sufficient signatures to spur a vote in the direction of a considerably tighter country-wide legislation.


Opponents of the initiative, which embrace the Swiss authorities and parliament, say it goes too far.

Philip Morris Worldwide (PMI), the world’s largest tobacco firm, which, like British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco, is headquartered in Switzerland and which has helped fund the “No” marketing campaign, described the initiative as “excessive”.

“This can be a slippery slope so far as particular person freedom is anxious,” a spokesman for PMI’s Swiss part instructed AFP, warning that it “paves the best way for additional promoting bans on merchandise equivalent to alcohol or sugar”.

Jean-Paul Humair, who heads a Geneva dependancy prevention centre and serves as a spokesman for the “Sure” marketing campaign, flatly rejected that comparability.

“There isn’t a different shopper product that kills half of all customers,” he instructed AFP.

Campaigners declare lax promoting legal guidelines have stymied efforts to carry down smoking charges within the Alpine nation of 8.6 million folks, the place greater than 1 / 4 of adults devour tobacco merchandise. There are round 9,500 tobacco-linked deaths annually.

The most recent gfs.bern ballot hinted that 63 p.c of voters favoured the tobacco promoting ban, however it should additionally want backing from a majority of Switzerland’s 26 cantons to cross.

Animal testing

There’s in the meantime little probability {that a} bid to ban all animal and human testing will undergo, with solely 1 / 4 of these questioned within the newest survey backing the transfer.

All political events, parliament and the federal government oppose it, warning it goes too far and would have dire penalties for medical analysis.

Switzerland has since 1985 rejected three comparable initiatives by massive margins.

Researchers insist medical progress is unattainable with out experimentation, and even the Swiss Animal Safety group has warned in opposition to the initiative’s “radical” calls for.

Swiss authorities insist the nation already has among the many world’s strictest legal guidelines regulating animal testing.

Because the legal guidelines have tightened, the variety of animals used has fallen sharply in latest a long time, from practically two million per yr within the early Eighties to round 560,000 at this time.

In one other animal-themed vote, inhabitants within the northern Basel-Stadt canton will on Sunday determine whether or not non-human primates ought to be granted a number of the similar primary elementary rights as their human cousins.

Among the many different points on Sunday’s slate, there can even be a nationwide referendum on a brand new legislation geared toward offering extra state funding to media firms, which have seen their promoting revenues evaporate in recent times.

The federal government argues the additional funding might safe the survival of many small, regional papers in peril, and in addition help with their expensive digital transition.

However the newest ballot signifies a win for the “No” marketing campaign, backed by rightwing events, who cost the subsidy would primarily profit massive media teams and could be a waste of public funds.

Supply hyperlink


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here