Meta Platforms Inc., filed an reply to the amended consolidated class motion grievance towards them, denying over 800 paragraphs of allegations within the grievance.
Within the authentic grievance, which just lately survived a movement to dismiss, the plaintiffs argue that clients—each companies and individuals—who bought Fb, now Meta’s promoting companies overpaid as a consequence of Meta’s unlawful monopolization of social media promoting.
The plaintiffs who’re shoppers allege that Meta made a number of false claims about its information privateness companies which disadvantaged shoppers of the best to manage their privateness.
Meta’s reply admits solely easy info, like that plaintiffs bought promoting companies from Meta and different primary info.
Counsel for the proposed advertiser class is Bathaee Dunne LLP , Scott + Scott Attorneys at Regulation LLP, Ahdoot & Wolfson PC, and Levin Sedran & Berman LLP.
Meta is represented by Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.