IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig, testifying earlier than Congress in April 2021, estimated the hole between taxes owed and taxes collected in the US to be near $1 trillion. Whereas there may be some debate as to how a lot lax reporting on cryptocurrency transactions contributes to this so-called “tax hole,” with a market capitalization hovering on the time of writing round $2 trillion, cryptocurrency investments have more and more turn into an object of regulatory scrutiny.
Digital foreign money disclosure on Type 1040
Starting with Discover 2014-21, the IRS has constantly taken the view that cryptocurrencies are property for U.S. federal revenue tax functions. Absent any particular statutory or regulatory exception, U.S. particular person taxpayers are typically required to report features realized on the sale of property (together with cryptocurrency) and pay tax on these features. To remind taxpayers of this requirement, Type 1040 now particularly asks taxpayers whether or not they have acquired, bought, exchanged or in any other case disposed of any monetary curiosity in any digital foreign money. (The directions outline “digital foreign money” for this function as a digital illustration of worth aside from a illustration of a “actual” (i.e., fiat) foreign money that features as a unit of account, a retailer of worth, or a medium of alternate. Cryptocurrencies are included on this definition). The query on Type 1040 requires an affirmative reply of “sure” or “no” from all taxpayers.
A model of the digital foreign money query was included on Schedule 1 of Type 1040 when it was launched in 2019 however, starting with the 2020 tax 12 months, the query has had a extra outstanding place on web page 1 (and, at the moment, requested: “At any time throughout 2020, did you obtain, promote, ship, alternate, or in any other case purchase any monetary curiosity in any digital foreign money?”). The wording of the query has been modified for the 2021 tax 12 months to take away the phrase “ship” and change “in any other case purchase” with “in any other case disposed of,” in step with the IRS’s concentrate on figuring out taxable occasions involving cryptocurrency. Usually any transaction involving cryptocurrency through the tax 12 months would require a taxpayer to reply “sure” to this query, except for purchases of digital foreign money with actual foreign money (with no additional exercise).
Growth of 1099-B and 8300 reporting to digital property
Throughout his congressional testimony, Rettig additionally really useful that Congress cross laws requiring info reporting for cryptocurrency transactions. The Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act (IIJA), signed into legislation by President Biden on November 15, 2021, does this.
Below the brand new legislation, “any one who (for consideration) is liable for repeatedly offering any service effectuating transfers of digital property on behalf of one other particular person” is a “dealer” for functions of Inside Income Code Part 6045 and required to report these transfers to the IRS on Type 1099-B. The IIJA defines “digital property” as “any digital illustration of worth which is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or any comparable expertise as specified by the Secretary,” besides as in any other case supplied by the Secretary (a broad definition with the potential to embody a variety of crypto-assets, together with, maybe, “non-fungible tokens,” or NFTs). Failure to adjust to this reporting requirement would set off penalties beneath Inside Income Code Part 6724.
This definition of “dealer,” as amended by the IIJA, has been criticized by some members of Congress and lots of within the cryptocurrency business as overbroad, because the language might probably decide up different members within the cryptocurrency ecosystem equivalent to miners and pockets builders, slightly than merely cryptocurrency exchanges. A bipartisan group of legislators tried to revise the language to handle these issues, however the proposed modification didn’t make it into the ultimate invoice. Whereas it stays to be seen how the U.S. Treasury, which will likely be tasked with implementing the brand new reporting requirement, will interpret the language, unofficial statements from Treasury point out that it’ll not search to implement this requirement in opposition to miners and {hardware} developments.
The IIJA additionally amends Part 6050I, which typically requires taxpayers who obtain over $10,000 in money in the middle of the taxpayer’s commerce or enterprise to report this receipt to the IRS on Type 8300, to use to receipts of digital property. The brand new reporting necessities are efficient for returns required to be filed and statements required to be furnished after December 31, 2023.
The brand new reporting necessities are projected to lift further income of $28 billion over the following ten years, in keeping with estimates ready by the Joint Committee on Taxation—a large sum, although unlikely to make a major affect on the tax hole.
Different legislative proposals
Different potential legislative modifications affecting the taxation of cryptocurrency transactions are at the moment into consideration by Congress. The “Construct Again Higher Act” (BBBA), which was permitted by the U.S. Home of Representatives solely to stall within the U.S. Senate, would broaden the “wash sale” guidelines of Code Part 1091 and the constructive sale rule of Code Part 1259 to cryptocurrency property. A wash sale is a technique that successfully offers an investor with a tax-deductible loss whereas sustaining their place in an funding. Code Part 1091(a) disallows a direct loss deduction in circumstances the place a taxpayer sells at a loss and reacquires the identical asset or one thing “considerably comparable” inside thirty days earlier than or after the loss sale however is restricted by its phrases to loss gross sales of inventory, securities, and sure choices. As a result of cryptocurrencies aren’t thought-about “securities” for functions of those guidelines beneath present legislation, crypto-investors have been capable of receive a tax profit by “harvesting” tax losses throughout market downswings with out truly cashing out of the funding.
The constructive sale guidelines in Code Part 1259 are supposed to handle the reverse state of affairs—a taxpayer successfully liquidates an appreciated monetary place with out recognizing taxable achieve. Below present legislation, disposing of an appreciated monetary place in any inventory, debt instrument, or partnership curiosity in a brief sale or futures or ahead contract for a similar or considerably comparable property is handled as a constructive sale and subsequently a taxable occasion. The BBBA would restrict use of each the wash sale and constructive sale methods by cryptocurrency traders by extending utility of Code Sections 1091 and 1259 to digital property equivalent to cryptocurrency.
It stays to be seen whether or not Congress will revisit these proposals in 2022, both as a part of the BBBA or a standalone invoice. Nonetheless, the proposed modifications recommend rising curiosity in Congress in closing what some understand to be “tax loopholes” with respect to this asset class. (The modifications to the wash sale and constructive sale guidelines mentioned above had been estimated to lift $16.8 billion over 10 years, per the Joint Committee on Taxation.)
© 2022 Proskauer Rose LLP. Nationwide Legislation Assessment, Quantity XII, Quantity 64